NuX HoldingsNuX Holdings
N
NuX Holdings™
Measurement Methodology
NuX Holdings Measurement Methodology™

Evidence-bound. Doctrine-locked. Human-reviewed.

NuX Holdings™ does not estimate empathy. It measures human experience quality against an evidence standard — NuX v0.1 — and rolls it up under Directive 6. Every score on every executive surface carries its confidence provenance, in plain sight.

NuX v0.1

The six measured dimensions

Each interaction is scored on six orthogonal dimensions. Reviewer notes are stored as evidence and surfaced on the score detail view.

RCNRecognition

Was the person seen as themselves, not as a ticket type?

CLAClarity

Was the next step unambiguous and honest about constraints?

RSPRespect

Was the interaction free of coercion, condescension, or scripted dishonesty?

OWNOwnership

Did a human or system take accountability — or pass the problem on?

CONConsistency

Did the answer hold across channels, agents, and AI handoffs?

AAIAI-Assist Integrity

Did AI assist within its competence and hand off cleanly when not?

Scoring Pipeline

From interaction to executive surface

  1. 01
    Ingest

    Interaction signal lands via CSV, connector, or AI agent log. Field mapping is explicit; nothing is inferred about identity that wasn't provided.

  2. 02
    Score (NuX v0.1)

    Each interaction is scored across the six dimensions on a sampled cohort, with reviewer notes attached as evidence.

  3. 03
    Composite (Directive 6)

    Platform-wide composite — Empathy, Warmth, Precision, Dialogue, Resilience, Safety — rolls NuX evidence into executive-grade exposure.

  4. 04
    Calibrate

    Per-tenant calibration corrects for channel mix, business unit, and language. Calibration coefficients are versioned in scoring_config.

  5. 05
    Human review

    Anything that crosses the judgment threshold is human-reviewed before it lands on an executive surface. Reviewer identity is recorded.

  6. 06
    Publish

    Scores ship to Watchtower tagged ● Measured · ◆ Human-reviewed. Everything else carries its honest provenance flag.

Confidence Framework

Every number carries its provenance

No NuX Holdings surface shows a number without telling you how it was produced. The four levels below appear inline on every score, chart, and executive briefing.

Measured

Real ingested data — human-audited under NuX v0.1. Defensible to CFO, auditor, and regulator.

Illustrative

Directional projection or demo data. Not a measurement. Replaced once real data lands.

Calibration & Review

Why your number is your number

Per-tenant calibration

Channel mix, business unit, and language shift the raw distribution. Calibration coefficients are versioned in scoring_config so every score can be reproduced against the exact coefficients used to publish it.

Human-review boundary

Scores that escalate exposure — attrition, complaints, regulatory, AI-human transition — are gated behind named reviewer sign-off. Reviewer identity is logged to the audit ledger alongside the publish event.

Inter-reviewer agreement

Sampled cohorts are double-scored to measure reviewer drift. Drift beyond threshold triggers re-calibration before further publishing.

Evidence retention

Reviewer notes and the evidence chain are retained for the life of the engagement and exportable for audit. The score is never separated from the evidence that produced it.

Next

See the standards behind every published score.

Measurement Standards & Provenance →Methodology Center™ (per-index) →